AB/SB 130: Proposed Revisions to Independent Study

July 8, 2021

This resource is provided by ACSA Partner4Purpose AALRR.

The California legislature is moving quickly to make changes to independent study for the 2021-2022 school year only. Proposed Assembly Bill 130 and Senate Bill 130, provide a pathway for students to participate in independent study for the 2021-2022 school year when in-person instruction would put the student’s health at risk, as determined by the student’s legal guardian. Local education agencies (“LEAs”) would be required to revise existing independent study policies and procedures to comply with changes in the bills if one or both become law. These revisions could impact: notification of the independent study option, written agreements, student-parent-educator conferences, attendance, access to connectivity and LEA-owned devices, synchronous instruction, live interaction, satisfactory educational progress, academic and other supports, documentation of student participation, maintenance of evidence of student engagement, and the transition processes for students who wish to return to in-person instruction. AB/SB 130 would also amend school closure requirements for unanticipated events or natural disasters to include a plan for independent study.

The proposed changes to independent study are likely to have implications for some students with individualized education programs or section 504 plans where in-person instruction for all or part of the 2021-2022 school year would put the student’s health at risk. Stay tuned as we will update you on any actions taken by California legislature and/or Governor. We will issue an additional and lengthier Alert regarding the far reaching implications of changes to distance learning and/or independent study laws for students with disabilities and other vulnerable student groups for the 2021-2022 school year should either or both bills become law. 

This AALRR publication is intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in reaching a conclusion in a particular area of law. Applicability of the legal principles discussed may differ substantially in individual situations. Receipt of this or any other AALRR publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Firm is not responsible for inadvertent errors that may occur in the publishing process. 

© 2021 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo

Previous Article
New Laws on Student Retention Create More Pandemic-Related Obligations for Schools
New Laws on Student Retention Create More Pandemic-Related Obligations for Schools

Next Article
EIFD and Tax Increment — A Public Finance Practitioner Discussion [PODCAST]
EIFD and Tax Increment — A Public Finance Practitioner Discussion [PODCAST]

In this podcast, attorneys from Lozano Smith discuss the Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts (EIFD)...